Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCEX vs NAESX
FSCEX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCEX vs NAESX
FSCEX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCEX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCEX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FSCEX (2.37B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSCEX: NAESX (1.09) vs FSCEX (0.05). FSCEX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCEX (28 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSCEX (1.95) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSCEX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX (18.54) and FSCEX (17.76) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. FSCEX (-15.90).
| FSCEX | NAESX | FSCEX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.17 | 1,147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.17 | 1,147% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.418 | 16.451 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 1.09 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.76 | 18.54 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.33 | 52.30 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.90 | 33.18 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.54 | 151.38 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement