Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCHX vs FSDPX
FSCHX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSCHX vs FSDPX
FSCHX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCHX vs. FSDPX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCHX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 748M vs. FSCHX (423M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than FSCHX: FSDPX (1.38) vs FSCHX (1.08). FSCHX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: FSCHX (41 years) vs FSDPX (40 years). FSDPX (0.69) and FSCHX (0.68) have similar cost to investors . FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSCHX (46.00). FSCHX (0) and FSDPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.17 vs. FSCHX (6.71). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 10.65 vs. FSCHX (-12.37).
| FSCHX | FSDPX | FSCHX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.69 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.69 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.968 | 11.689 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 423M | 748M | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.38 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 13.17 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.20 | 10.55 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.37 | 10.65 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.22 | 45.76 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement