Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCHX vs FSDPX
FSCHX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSCHX vs FSDPX
FSCHX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCHX vs. FSDPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCHX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 785M vs. FSCHX (451M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than FSCHX: FSDPX (1.34) vs FSCHX (1.03). FSCHX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: FSCHX (41 years) vs FSDPX (40 years). FSDPX (0.69) and FSCHX (0.68) have similar cost to investors . FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSCHX (46.00). FSCHX (0) and FSDPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSDPX (8.69) and FSCHX (8.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 7.23 vs. FSCHX (-10.98).
| FSCHX | FSDPX | FSCHX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.69 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.69 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.804 | 7.552 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 451M | 785M | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.34 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.56 | 8.69 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.40 | 3.69 | -146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.98 | 7.23 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.50 | 44.00 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement