Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
Price$17.05
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.55B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.17
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. FSCNX (4.55B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBAX (1.15) vs FSCNX (0.89). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSCNX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FSCNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSCNX (17.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.19 vs. RLBAX (8.68). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.76 vs. FSCNX (32.16).
| FSCNX | RLBAX | FSCNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.360 | 12.515 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 263B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.15 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.19 | 8.68 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.87 | 40.17 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.16 | 38.76 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.26 | 71.09 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement