Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
Price$17.06
Change-$0.10 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.81B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.29
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. FSCNX (4.81B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBAX (1.08) vs FSCNX (0.85). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSCNX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FSCNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSCNX (17.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. RLBAX (7.96). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.76 vs. FSCNX (26.17).
| FSCNX | RLBAX | FSCNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.821 | 12.973 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 264B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.08 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 7.96 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.30 | 37.66 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.17 | 33.76 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.98 | 63.03 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement