Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
Price$16.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.45B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.79
Change+$0.13 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.84B
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. FSCNX (4.45B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBAX (1.17) vs FSCNX (0.91). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSCNX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FSCNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSCNX (17.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.39 vs. RLBAX (9.31). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.80 vs. FSCNX (28.33).
| FSCNX | RLBAX | FSCNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.941 | 8.447 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.45B | 254B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.17 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.39 | 9.31 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.31 | 29.22 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.33 | 32.80 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.60 | 57.96 | 92% |