Ad is loading...
FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
Price$15.03
Change+$0.18 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.21B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$33.37
Change+$0.43 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9B
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 227B vs. FSCNX (4.21B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBAX (1.27) vs FSCNX (0.98). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSCNX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FSCNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.33). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSCNX (21.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. FSCNX (1.73). RLBAX (31.54) and FSCNX (30.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSCNX | RLBAX | FSCNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.33 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.33 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.287 | -1.759 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 227B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.27 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | 3.37 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 12.43 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.49 | 31.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.66 | 41.03 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...