Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
Price$16.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.60
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.22B
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. FSCNX (4.44B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBAX (1.18) vs FSCNX (0.91). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSCNX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FSCNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSCNX (17.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. RLBAX (6.25). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.21 vs. FSCNX (30.75).
| FSCNX | RLBAX | FSCNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.495 | 7.887 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 252B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.18 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 6.25 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.78 | 33.21 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.75 | 36.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.48 | 56.95 | 89% |