Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
Price$17.22
Change-$0.06 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.73
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. FSCNX (4.68B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBAX (1.10) vs FSCNX (0.87). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSCNX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FSCNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSCNX (17.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.32 vs. RLBAX (9.08). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. FSCNX (30.23).
| FSCNX | RLBAX | FSCNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.31 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.215 | 14.271 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 266B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.10 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | 9.08 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.01 | 48.64 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.23 | 38.13 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.66 | 69.46 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers