Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBAX
FSCNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSCNX (5.6B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBAX (1.13) vs FSCNX (0.90). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSCNX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.88 vs. RLBAX (10.43). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.18 vs. FSCNX (19.98).
| FSCNX | RLBAX | FSCNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.32 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.423 | 7.908 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.6B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.13 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.88 | 10.43 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.38 | 35.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.98 | 28.18 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.94 | 73.40 | 101% |