Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBBX
FSCNX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBBX
FSCNX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSCNX (5.61B). RLBBX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBBX (1.14) vs FSCNX (0.89). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: FSCNX (19 years) vs RLBBX (24 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.33). RLBBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBBX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBBX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.21 vs. RLBBX (15.79). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 31.82 vs. FSCNX (23.36).
| FSCNX | RLBBX | FSCNX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.33 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.33 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.916 | 8.971 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.14 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.21 | 15.79 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.89 | 41.01 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.36 | 31.82 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.43 | 80.19 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement