Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBFX
FSCNX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBFX
FSCNX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FSCNX (5.7B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBFX (2.03) vs FSCNX (0.89). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FSCNX (19 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBFX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. RLBFX (6.98). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. FSCNX (19.34).
| FSCNX | RLBFX | FSCNX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.30 | 557% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.30 | 567% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.080 | 8.705 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.7B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 2.03 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 6.98 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.53 | 42.70 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.34 | 33.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.00 | 87.98 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement