Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCNX vs RLBFX
FSCNX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FSCNX vs RLBFX
FSCNX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCNX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCNX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FSCNX (5.6B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: RLBFX (2.05) vs FSCNX (0.90). FSCNX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FSCNX (19 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FSCNX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX (12.94) and FSCNX (12.31) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.73 vs. FSCNX (22.00).
| FSCNX | RLBFX | FSCNX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.30 | 557% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.30 | 567% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.036 | 10.287 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.6B | 283B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | 12.94 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.59 | 46.32 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.00 | 35.73 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.34 | 86.86 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement