Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCOX vs OSMAX
FSCOX vs OSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCOX vs OSMAX
FSCOX vs OSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCOX vs. OSMAX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCOX is a Hold and OSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSMAX has more cash in the bank: 2.37B vs. FSCOX (1.72B). FSCOX pays higher dividends than OSMAX: FSCOX (1.88) vs OSMAX (1.41). FSCOX was incepted earlier than OSMAX: FSCOX (21 years) vs OSMAX (29 years). OSMAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FSCOX (0.96). FSCOX (53.00) and OSMAX (52.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than OSMAX: FSCOX (0) vs OSMAX (1000). FSCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. OSMAX (-13.00). FSCOX return over 5 years is better than : -6.75 vs. OSMAX (-35.83).
| FSCOX | OSMAX | FSCOX / OSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.42 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.42 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.061 | 0.563 | 1,253% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 2.37B | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.41 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.21 | -13.00 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.07 | -15.00 | -160% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.75 | -35.83 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.05 | 3.10 | 2,164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers