Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs FSHOX
FSCPX vs FSHOX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs FSHOX
FSCPX vs FSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. FSHOX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a Hold and FSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 713M vs. FSHOX (605M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: FSHOX (0.96) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than FSHOX: FSCPX (36 years) vs FSHOX (40 years). FSCPX (0.69) and FSHOX (0.68) have similar cost to investors . FSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FSHOX (16.00). FSCPX (0) and FSHOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.43 vs. FSHOX (-15.14). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 24.42 vs. FSCPX (-13.39).
| FSCPX | FSHOX | FSCPX / FSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.68 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.68 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.156 | -6.400 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 713M | 605M | 118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.43 | -15.14 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.42 | 17.04 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.39 | 24.42 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.33 | 103.85 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement