Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs FSRPX
FSCPX vs FSRPX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs FSRPX
FSCPX vs FSRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. FSRPX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a Hold and FSRPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.35B vs. FSCPX (918M). FSRPX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: FSRPX (0.16) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than FSRPX: FSCPX (36 years) vs FSRPX (41 years). FSCPX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.63). FSRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FSCPX (0) and FSRPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSCPX (500) and FSRPX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. FSRPX (-6.08). FSCPX return over 5 years is better than : -5.29 vs. FSRPX (-27.10).
| FSCPX | FSRPX | FSCPX / FSRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.63 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.63 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.485 | -1.842 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 918M | 2.35B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.16 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.77 | -6.08 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.15 | 0.55 | 4,758% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.29 | -27.10 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.69 | 70.89 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement