Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs RYLCX
FSCPX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYLCX
FSCPX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYLCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a Hold and RYLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 713M vs. RYLCX (4.82M). RYLCX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYLCX (0.08) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSCPX (36 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.69). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSCPX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYLCX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.80 vs. FSCPX (-12.43). RYLCX return over 5 years is better than : -10.82 vs. FSCPX (-13.39).
| FSCPX | RYLCX | FSCPX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.156 | -6.166 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 713M | 4.82M | 14,796% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.08 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.43 | -10.80 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.42 | 23.67 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.39 | -10.82 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.33 | 39.83 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement