Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs RYLCX
FSCPX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYLCX
FSCPX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYLCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a Hold and RYLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 748M vs. RYLCX (5.2M). RYLCX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYLCX (0.08) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSCPX (36 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.69). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSCPX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYLCX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.40 vs. FSCPX (-3.92). RYLCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.95 vs. FSCPX (-7.59).
| FSCPX | RYLCX | FSCPX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.39 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.308 | 0.590 | -1,069% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 748M | 5.2M | 14,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.08 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.92 | -1.40 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.18 | 33.13 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.59 | -0.95 | 800% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.19 | 46.13 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers