Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs RYLSX
FSCPX vs RYLSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYLSX
FSCPX vs RYLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYLSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a Hold and RYLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 713M vs. RYLSX (4.82M). RYLSX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYLSX (0.06) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYLSX: FSCPX (36 years) vs RYLSX (22 years). RYLSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.69). RYLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLSX: FSCPX (0) vs RYLSX (2500). RYLSX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYLSX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). RYLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.13 vs. FSCPX (-12.43). RYLSX return over 5 years is better than : -6.41 vs. FSCPX (-13.39).
| FSCPX | RYLSX | FSCPX / RYLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.69 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.156 | -5.672 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 713M | 4.82M | 14,796% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.06 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.43 | -10.13 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.42 | 26.48 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.39 | -6.41 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.33 | 54.46 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement