Ad is loading...
FSCPX vs RYRCX
FSCPX vs RYRCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYRCX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
Price$56.37
Change-$4.27 (-7.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets468.29M
Rydex Retailing C
Price$38.40
Change-$2.53 (-6.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.09M
FSCPX vs RYRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYRCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a StrongBuy and RYRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 468M vs. RYRCX (6.09M). FSCPX pays higher dividends than RYRCX: FSCPX (0.07) vs RYRCX (0.00). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYRCX: FSCPX (35 years) vs RYRCX (24 years). RYRCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.70). RYRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 299.00 vs. FSCPX (33.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYRCX: FSCPX (0) vs RYRCX (2500). RYRCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYRCX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). RYRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. FSCPX (-3.15). RYRCX return over 5 years is better than : 81.91 vs. FSCPX (62.74).
| FSCPX | RYRCX | FSCPX / RYRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.860 | -2.034 | 632% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 468M | 6.09M | 7,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.15 | 5.54 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.39 | 7.23 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.74 | 81.91 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.70 | 66.33 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers