Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs RYRCX
FSCPX vs RYRCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYRCX
FSCPX vs RYRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYRCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a StrongBuy and RYRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 887M vs. RYRCX (4.63M). RYRCX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYRCX (2.29) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYRCX: FSCPX (36 years) vs RYRCX (25 years). RYRCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.69). RYRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 252.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYRCX: FSCPX (0) vs RYRCX (2500). RYRCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYRCX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). RYRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.87 vs. FSCPX (-0.69). RYRCX (-7.67) and FSCPX (-8.05) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSCPX | RYRCX | FSCPX / RYRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.39 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.890 | -1.126 | 434% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 887M | 4.63M | 19,178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.29 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.69 | 2.87 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.51 | 29.40 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.05 | -7.67 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.07 | 98.15 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers