Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCPX vs RYRCX
FSCPX vs RYRCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYRCX
FSCPX vs RYRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYRCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a Hold and RYRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 918M vs. RYRCX (4.57M). RYRCX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYRCX (2.29) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYRCX: FSCPX (36 years) vs RYRCX (25 years). RYRCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.69). RYRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 296.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYRCX: FSCPX (0) vs RYRCX (2500). RYRCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYRCX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). FSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. RYRCX (5.58). FSCPX return over 5 years is better than : -6.16 vs. RYRCX (-7.76).
| FSCPX | RYRCX | FSCPX / RYRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.39 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.239 | -2.500 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 918M | 4.57M | 20,088% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.29 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 5.58 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.59 | 33.09 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.16 | -7.76 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.33 | 106.03 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers