Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCRX vs FTHFX
FSCRX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts FSCRX vs FTHFX
FSCRX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCRX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCRX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FSCRX (2.25B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than FSCRX: FTHFX (0.59) vs FSCRX (0.34). FSCRX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: FSCRX (26 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FSCRX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FSCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: FSCRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.16 vs. FSCRX (9.69). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.46 vs. FSCRX (-11.73).
| FSCRX | FTHFX | FSCRX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.64 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.64 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.378 | 10.769 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 11.2B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.59 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.69 | 27.16 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.69 | 56.17 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.73 | 53.46 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.14 | 240.59 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement