Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCTX vs NAESX
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCTX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap M
Price$25.31
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCTX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCTX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSCTX (2.02B). FSCTX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCTX (1.48) vs NAESX (1.22). FSCTX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCTX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCTX (1.53) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCTX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.86 vs. FSCTX (-10.54). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 39.31 vs. FSCTX (10.32).
| FSCTX | NAESX | FSCTX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.161 | 2.409 | 297% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.22 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.54 | -0.86 | 1,232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.94 | 29.99 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.32 | 39.31 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.03 | 122.07 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement