Ad is loading...
FSCTX vs NAESX
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCTX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap M
Price$21.93
Change+$0.30 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.04
Change+$1.67 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCTX vs. NAESX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCTX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FSCTX (1.76B). FSCTX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCTX (1.75) vs NAESX (1.43). FSCTX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCTX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCTX (1.53) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCTX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. FSCTX (-15.45). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.08 vs. FSCTX (22.56).
| FSCTX | NAESX | FSCTX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.347 | -8.414 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 140B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.43 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.45 | -0.09 | 16,953% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.12 | 20.27 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.56 | 65.08 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.85 | 87.81 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...