Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCTX vs NAESX
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCTX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap M
Price$23.01
Change+$0.30 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$111.61
Change+$1.26 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCTX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCTX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FSCTX (1.83B). FSCTX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCTX (1.68) vs NAESX (1.35). FSCTX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCTX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCTX (1.53) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCTX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. FSCTX (-11.70). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.20 vs. FSCTX (14.22).
| FSCTX | NAESX | FSCTX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.771 | -4.086 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 148B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.35 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.70 | 5.13 | -228% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.77 | 16.63 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.22 | 52.20 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.39 | 96.08 | -15% |