Ad is loading...
FSCTX vs NAESX
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCTX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap M
Price$20.83
Change+$1.72 (+9.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.55
Change+$8.70 (+9.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCTX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCTX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FSCTX (1.82B). FSCTX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCTX (1.73) vs NAESX (1.39). FSCTX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCTX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCTX (1.53) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). FSCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCTX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.70 vs. FSCTX (-26.15). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.35 vs. FSCTX (15.77).
| FSCTX | NAESX | FSCTX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.17 | 900% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.025 | -19.296 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.39 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.15 | -13.70 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.11 | -5.18 | 407% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.77 | 56.35 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.57 | 63.14 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...