Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCTX vs NAESX
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCTX vs NAESX
FSCTX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCTX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCTX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. FSCTX (2.37B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSCTX: NAESX (1.08) vs FSCTX (0.02). FSCTX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCTX (28 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSCTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSCTX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.13 vs. NAESX (28.50). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.56 vs. FSCTX (10.42).
| FSCTX | NAESX | FSCTX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.623 | 15.064 | 150% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 183B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.08 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.13 | 28.50 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.26 | 56.99 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.42 | 34.56 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.17 | 172.26 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers