Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs VSIAX
FSCWX vs VSIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs VSIAX
FSCWX vs VSIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. VSIAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Hold and VSIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSIAX has more cash in the bank: 68.2B vs. FSCWX (281M). VSIAX pays higher dividends than FSCWX: VSIAX (1.75) vs FSCWX (1.09). FSCWX was incepted earlier than VSIAX: FSCWX (10 years) vs VSIAX (15 years). FSCWX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VSIAX (0.07). VSIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FSCWX (21.00). VSIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: VSIAX (3000) vs FSCWX (1000000). VSIAX (13.62) and FSCWX (13.38) have marching annual gain over last year. FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 46.80 vs. VSIAX (44.40).
| FSCWX | VSIAX | FSCWX / VSIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.07 | 1,114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.350 | 13.663 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 68.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.75 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.38 | 13.62 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.33 | 48.36 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.80 | 44.40 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.31 | 132.86 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers