Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs VSIAX
FSCWX vs VSIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs VSIAX
FSCWX vs VSIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. VSIAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Buy and VSIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSIAX has more cash in the bank: 67.8B vs. FSCWX (288M). VSIAX pays higher dividends than FSCWX: VSIAX (1.77) vs FSCWX (1.07). FSCWX was incepted earlier than VSIAX: FSCWX (10 years) vs VSIAX (15 years). FSCWX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VSIAX (0.07). VSIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FSCWX (21.00). VSIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: VSIAX (3000) vs FSCWX (1000000). VSIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.77 vs. FSCWX (19.64). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 50.93 vs. VSIAX (45.95).
| FSCWX | VSIAX | FSCWX / VSIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.07 | 1,114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.513 | 14.489 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288M | 67.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.77 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.64 | 20.77 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.30 | 45.87 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.93 | 45.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.86 | 131.96 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers