Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$29.21
Change+$0.21 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets781.28M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSCZX (781M). FSCZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSCZX (1.18) vs RMEBX (1.09). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.72). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. FSCZX (3.58). FSCZX return over 5 years is better than : 62.78 vs. RMEBX (55.29).
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.878 | 11.308 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 781M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.09 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.58 | 7.57 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 31.59 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.78 | 55.29 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement