Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$29.56
Change-$0.07 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets798M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. FSCZX (798M). FSCZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSCZX (1.17) vs RMEBX (1.05). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.72). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. FSCZX (2.45). FSCZX return over 5 years is better than : 62.24 vs. RMEBX (58.09).
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.655 | 14.628 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 798M | 113B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.05 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.45 | 7.96 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.70 | 43.02 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.24 | 58.09 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement