Ad is loading...
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$25.93
Change+$0.28 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets667.6M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.03
Change+$0.72 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. FSCZX (668M). FSCZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSCZX (1.27) vs RMEBX (1.18). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.77). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.70 vs. FSCZX (-2.57). FSCZX return over 5 years is better than : 65.31 vs. RMEBX (53.15).
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.074 | -1.317 | 385% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 668M | 97.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.18 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.57 | 3.70 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.67 | 9.15 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.31 | 53.15 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...