Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$27.57
Change+$0.28 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets681.76M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. FSCZX (682M). FSCZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSCZX (1.26) vs RMEBX (1.16). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.72). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. FSCZX (2.81). FSCZX (51.76) and RMEBX (50.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.995 | 5.842 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.16 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.81 | 8.87 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 17.32 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.76 | 50.55 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers