Ad is loading...
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$25.95
Change-$1.17 (-4.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets667.6M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.45
Change-$1.82 (-3.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. FSCZX (668M). FSCZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSCZX (1.27) vs RMEBX (1.18). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.77). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. FSCZX (1.08). FSCZX return over 5 years is better than : 98.30 vs. RMEBX (74.87).
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.366 | 2.774 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 668M | 103B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.18 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | 6.63 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.58 | 11.00 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.30 | 74.87 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...