Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$28.72
Change+$0.11 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets711.77M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.45
Change-$0.30 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FSCZX (712M). FSCZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSCZX (1.23) vs RMEBX (1.12). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.72). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. FSCZX (3.73). FSCZX return over 5 years is better than : 64.67 vs. RMEBX (57.73).
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.287 | 11.253 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 712M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.12 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | 9.90 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.93 | 27.05 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.67 | 57.73 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement