Ad is loading...
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$28.00
Change-$0.41 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets677.05M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. FSCZX (677M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSCZX: RMEBX (1.54) vs FSCZX (1.22). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (8 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. FSCZX (7.56). RMEBX (40.75) and FSCZX (39.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.550 | 4.809 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 677M | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.54 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 10.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.29 | 19.18 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.85 | 40.75 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.29 | - |