Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSCZX (843M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSCZX: RMEBX (0.99) vs FSCZX (0.24). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (10 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.71). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FSCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.28 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX (34.68) and FSCZX (33.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.807 | 8.448 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.99 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.28 | 4.65 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.12 | 34.88 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.09 | 34.68 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers