Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSCZX (787M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSCZX: RMEBX (1.04) vs FSCZX (0.26). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.71). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FSCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. FSCZX (21.98).
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.936 | 5.801 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.04 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.43 | 9.98 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.58 | 34.14 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.98 | 32.93 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement