Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMEBX
FSCZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSCZX (792M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSCZX: RMEBX (1.00) vs FSCZX (0.25). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSCZX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.71). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSCZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FSCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.19 vs. RMEBX (7.56). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. FSCZX (30.86).
| FSCZX | RMEBX | FSCZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.548 | 9.246 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 792M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.00 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.19 | 7.56 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.96 | 31.88 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.86 | 36.13 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement