Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMFCX
FSCZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMFCX
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
Price$29.21
Change+$0.21 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets781.28M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
FSCZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSCZX (781M). RMFCX (1.24) and FSCZX (1.18) have matching dividends . FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSCZX (9 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.72). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FSCZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. FSCZX (3.58). FSCZX return over 5 years is better than : 62.78 vs. RMFCX (56.41).
| FSCZX | RMFCX | FSCZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.878 | 11.421 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 781M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.24 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.58 | 7.71 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 32.16 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.78 | 56.41 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement