Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMFCX
FSCZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMFCX
FSCZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSCZX (827M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSCZX: RMFCX (1.15) vs FSCZX (0.24). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSCZX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.71). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FSCZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FSCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.39 vs. RMFCX (9.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.68 vs. FSCZX (32.68).
| FSCZX | RMFCX | FSCZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.963 | 11.616 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 827M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.15 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.39 | 9.80 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.20 | 38.60 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.68 | 37.68 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement