Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMFCX
FSCZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMFCX
FSCZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSCZX (787M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSCZX: RMFCX (1.19) vs FSCZX (0.26). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSCZX (9 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSCZX (0.71). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FSCZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FSCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. RMFCX (10.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. FSCZX (21.98).
| FSCZX | RMFCX | FSCZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.936 | 6.510 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.19 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.43 | 10.31 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.58 | 35.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.98 | 34.04 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement