Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMFEX
FSCZX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMFEX
FSCZX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSCZX (827M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than FSCZX: RMFEX (1.41) vs FSCZX (0.24). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FSCZX (10 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). FSCZX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FSCZX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FSCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.39 vs. RMFEX (10.16). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.85 vs. FSCZX (32.68).
| FSCZX | RMFEX | FSCZX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.62 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.62 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.963 | 11.820 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 827M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.41 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.39 | 10.16 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.20 | 39.94 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.68 | 39.85 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement