Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCZX vs RMFEX
FSCZX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FSCZX vs RMFEX
FSCZX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCZX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCZX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSCZX (787M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than FSCZX: RMFEX (1.45) vs FSCZX (0.26). FSCZX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FSCZX (9 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). FSCZX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). FSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FSCZX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FSCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. RMFEX (10.46). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. FSCZX (21.98).
| FSCZX | RMFEX | FSCZX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.62 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.62 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.936 | 5.987 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.45 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.43 | 10.46 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.58 | 35.96 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.98 | 35.97 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement