Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs MCGRX
FSDPX vs MCGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs MCGRX
FSDPX vs MCGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. MCGRX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and MCGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 748M vs. MCGRX (200M). MCGRX pays higher dividends than FSDPX: MCGRX (2.09) vs FSDPX (1.38). FSDPX was incepted earlier than MCGRX: FSDPX (40 years) vs MCGRX (32 years). MCGRX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.69). MCGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSDPX (56.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGRX: FSDPX (0) vs MCGRX (1000). MCGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.46 vs. FSDPX (10.50). MCGRX return over 5 years is better than : 7.94 vs. FSDPX (3.09).
| FSDPX | MCGRX | FSDPX / MCGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.88 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.88 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.391 | -0.767 | -703% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 748M | 200M | 374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 2.09 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.50 | 11.46 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.83 | 1.62 | -113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.09 | 7.94 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.57 | -30.61 | -142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers