Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs RGNCX
FSDPX vs RGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs RGNCX
FSDPX vs RGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. RGNCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and RGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 824M vs. RGNCX (633M). RGNCX pays higher dividends than FSDPX: RGNCX (3.28) vs FSDPX (1.30). FSDPX was incepted earlier than RGNCX: FSDPX (40 years) vs RGNCX (19 years). RGNCX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.69). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGNCX (50.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNCX: FSDPX (0) vs RGNCX (2500). RGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 91.73 vs. FSDPX (17.56). RGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 248.62 vs. FSDPX (10.81).
| FSDPX | RGNCX | FSDPX / RGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.28 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.99 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.897 | 33.578 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 824M | 633M | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 3.28 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.56 | 91.73 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.99 | 132.22 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.81 | 248.62 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.93 | 220.30 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers