Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs VMIAX
FSDPX vs VMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs VMIAX
FSDPX vs VMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. VMIAX commentary
Jul 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and VMIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMIAX has more cash in the bank: 4.49B vs. FSDPX (785M). VMIAX (1.39) and FSDPX (1.34) have matching dividends . FSDPX was incepted earlier than VMIAX: FSDPX (40 years) vs VMIAX (22 years). FSDPX (0.69) is less costly to investors than VMIAX (0.09). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. VMIAX (7.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMIAX: FSDPX (0) vs VMIAX (100000). VMIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.75 vs. FSDPX (7.91). VMIAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.91 vs. FSDPX (6.38).
| FSDPX | VMIAX | FSDPX / VMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.09 | 767% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.09 | 767% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.290 | 9.271 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 785M | 4.49B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.39 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.91 | 10.75 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.01 | 21.11 | -0% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.38 | 25.91 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.60 | 110.67 | 40% |