Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSFWX vs RKCIX
FSFWX vs RKCIX Comparison
Open Charts FSFWX vs RKCIX
FSFWX vs RKCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFWX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. RKCIX (69.6M). FSFWX pays higher dividends than RKCIX: FSFWX (0.84) vs RKCIX (0.03). FSFWX was incepted earlier than RKCIX: FSFWX (6 years) vs RKCIX (5 years). RKCIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSFWX (0.70). FSFWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RKCIX (25.00). FSFWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RKCIX: FSFWX (250) vs RKCIX (1000000). FSFWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. RKCIX (1.21).
| FSFWX | RKCIX | FSFWX / RKCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.99 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.32 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.208 | 8.324 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 69.6M | 135,489% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.03 | 3,258% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 1.21 | 1,174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.30 | 16.22 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.47 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement