Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSFWX vs RSLAX
FSFWX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSFWX vs RSLAX
FSFWX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSFWX vs. RSLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFWX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFWX (91.4B) and RSLAX (91.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSFWX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: FSFWX (0.87) vs RSLAX (0.17). FSFWX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: FSFWX (6 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSFWX (0.70). FSFWX (41.00) and RSLAX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSFWX (250) and RSLAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSFWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.35 vs. RSLAX (7.36). FSFWX return over 5 years is better than : -7.78 vs. RSLAX (-14.43).
| FSFWX | RSLAX | FSFWX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.74 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.74 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.534 | 11.723 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 91.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.17 | 503% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.35 | 7.36 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.84 | 33.50 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.78 | -14.43 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement