Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGCX vs PDBSX
FSGCX vs PDBSX Comparison
Open Charts FSGCX vs PDBSX
FSGCX vs PDBSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGCX vs. PDBSX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGCX is a Hold and PDBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBSX has more cash in the bank: 53.4B vs. FSGCX (2.82B). PDBSX pays higher dividends than FSGCX: PDBSX (4.41) vs FSGCX (3.88). FSGCX was incepted earlier than PDBSX: FSGCX (28 years) vs PDBSX (8 years). FSGCX (1.25) is less costly to investors than PDBSX (0.69). PDBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSGCX (84.71). PDBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.27 vs. FSGCX (4.55). FSGCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.37 vs. PDBSX (0.33).
| FSGCX | PDBSX | FSGCX / PDBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.64 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.69 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.403 | 0.399 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 53.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 4.41 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.55 | 5.27 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.22 | 16.14 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.37 | 0.33 | 1,909% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers