Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs HBIOX
FSGEX vs HBIOX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs HBIOX
FSGEX vs HBIOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. HBIOX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Buy and HBIOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. HBIOX (875M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than HBIOX: FSGEX (2.64) vs HBIOX (1.14). FSGEX was incepted earlier than HBIOX: FSGEX (17 years) vs HBIOX (28 years). HBIOX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). HBIOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and HBIOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.58 vs. HBIOX (23.09). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 51.58 vs. HBIOX (15.39).
| FSGEX | HBIOX | FSGEX / HBIOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.01 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.01 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 10.757 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 875M | 8,491% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 1.14 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.58 | 23.09 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.23 | 56.84 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.58 | 15.39 | 335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.43 | 92.36 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement