Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs HSWCX
FSGEX vs HSWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs HSWCX
FSGEX vs HSWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. HSWCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and HSWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. HSWCX (9.64B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than HSWCX: FSGEX (2.64) vs HSWCX (1.76). FSGEX was incepted earlier than HSWCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs HSWCX (10 years). HSWCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). HSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSWCX: FSGEX (0) vs HSWCX (2000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.74 vs. HSWCX (19.43). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.38 vs. HSWCX (34.48).
| FSGEX | HSWCX | FSGEX / HSWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.80 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.80 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.175 | 8.495 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 9.64B | 771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 1.76 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.74 | 19.43 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.26 | 50.20 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.38 | 34.48 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers