Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs HSWCX
FSGEX vs HSWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs HSWCX
FSGEX vs HSWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. HSWCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and HSWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. HSWCX (9.47B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than HSWCX: FSGEX (2.63) vs HSWCX (1.74). FSGEX was incepted earlier than HSWCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs HSWCX (10 years). HSWCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). HSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSWCX: FSGEX (0) vs HSWCX (2000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.06 vs. HSWCX (15.90). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.66 vs. HSWCX (33.05).
| FSGEX | HSWCX | FSGEX / HSWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.80 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.80 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.153 | 7.645 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 9.47B | 791% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.74 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.06 | 15.90 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.20 | 44.51 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.66 | 33.05 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement