Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs HSWCX
FSGEX vs HSWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs HSWCX
FSGEX vs HSWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. HSWCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and HSWCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 77B vs. HSWCX (9.18B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than HSWCX: FSGEX (2.58) vs HSWCX (1.68). FSGEX was incepted earlier than HSWCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs HSWCX (10 years). HSWCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). HSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSWCX: FSGEX (0) vs HSWCX (2000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.49 vs. HSWCX (11.58). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.03 vs. HSWCX (31.78).
| FSGEX | HSWCX | FSGEX / HSWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.80 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.80 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.683 | 8.495 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77B | 9.18B | 838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 1.68 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.49 | 11.58 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.52 | 54.03 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.03 | 31.78 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers