Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs IIIIX
FSGEX vs IIIIX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs IIIIX
FSGEX vs IIIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. IIIIX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Buy and IIIIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. IIIIX (695M). IIIIX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: IIIIX (4.20) vs FSGEX (2.64). FSGEX was incepted earlier than IIIIX: FSGEX (17 years) vs IIIIX (18 years). IIIIX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). FSGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.00 vs. IIIIX (4.00). FSGEX (0) and IIIIX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.37 vs. IIIIX (20.06). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.10 vs. IIIIX (48.32).
| FSGEX | IIIIX | FSGEX / IIIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.45 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.58 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.973 | 8.975 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 695M | 10,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 4.20 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.37 | 20.06 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.19 | 57.60 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.10 | 48.32 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.45 | 133.87 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers