Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs KCISX
FSGEX vs KCISX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs KCISX
FSGEX vs KCISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. KCISX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and KCISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. KCISX (292M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than KCISX: FSGEX (2.63) vs KCISX (1.91). FSGEX was incepted earlier than KCISX: FSGEX (17 years) vs KCISX (11 years). KCISX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). KCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and KCISX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.06 vs. KCISX (26.49). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.66 vs. KCISX (32.14).
| FSGEX | KCISX | FSGEX / KCISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.19 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.20 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.153 | 15.444 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 292M | 25,651% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.91 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.06 | 26.49 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.20 | 62.73 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.66 | 32.14 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.49 | 134.71 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement