Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs MSQLX
FSGEX vs MSQLX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs MSQLX
FSGEX vs MSQLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. MSQLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and MSQLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. MSQLX (285M). MSQLX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: MSQLX (5.43) vs FSGEX (2.64). FSGEX was incepted earlier than MSQLX: FSGEX (17 years) vs MSQLX (14 years). MSQLX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). MSQLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and MSQLX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.02 vs. MSQLX (-36.41). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.31 vs. MSQLX (-56.61).
| FSGEX | MSQLX | FSGEX / MSQLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.80 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.94 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.339 | 4.897 | 334% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 285M | 26,070% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 5.43 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.02 | -36.41 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.50 | -45.39 | -164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.31 | -56.61 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.68 | -45.19 | -349% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers