Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs MSQLX
FSGEX vs MSQLX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs MSQLX
FSGEX vs MSQLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. MSQLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and MSQLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. MSQLX (192M). MSQLX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: MSQLX (5.44) vs FSGEX (2.63). FSGEX was incepted earlier than MSQLX: FSGEX (17 years) vs MSQLX (14 years). MSQLX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). MSQLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and MSQLX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.06 vs. MSQLX (-38.54). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.66 vs. MSQLX (-56.72).
| FSGEX | MSQLX | FSGEX / MSQLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.80 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.94 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.153 | 5.055 | 280% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 192M | 39,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 5.44 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.06 | -38.54 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.20 | -47.25 | -136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.66 | -56.72 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.49 | -47.78 | -288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement