Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs NWHMX
FSGEX vs NWHMX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs NWHMX
FSGEX vs NWHMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. NWHMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and NWHMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. NWHMX (304M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than NWHMX: FSGEX (2.63) vs NWHMX (2.45). FSGEX was incepted earlier than NWHMX: FSGEX (17 years) vs NWHMX (13 years). NWHMX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). NWHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.36 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHMX: FSGEX (0) vs NWHMX (1000000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.06 vs. NWHMX (22.08). NWHMX return over 5 years is better than : 61.56 vs. FSGEX (53.66).
| FSGEX | NWHMX | FSGEX / NWHMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.68 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.74 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.153 | 15.536 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 304M | 24,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.45 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.06 | 22.08 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.20 | 64.64 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.66 | 61.56 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.49 | 130.00 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement