Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs NWHNX
FSGEX vs NWHNX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs NWHNX
FSGEX vs NWHNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. NWHNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and NWHNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. NWHNX (304M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than NWHNX: FSGEX (2.64) vs NWHNX (2.31). FSGEX was incepted earlier than NWHNX: FSGEX (17 years) vs NWHNX (20 years). NWHNX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). NWHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.36 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHNX: FSGEX (0) vs NWHNX (50000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.02 vs. NWHNX (25.99). NWHNX return over 5 years is better than : 62.76 vs. FSGEX (55.31).
| FSGEX | NWHNX | FSGEX / NWHNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.80 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.86 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.339 | 15.612 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 50000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 304M | 24,441% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.31 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.02 | 25.99 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.50 | 71.92 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.31 | 62.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.68 | 139.83 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers