Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RIGBX
FSGEX vs RIGBX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RIGBX
FSGEX vs RIGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RIGBX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RIGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 77B vs. RIGBX (21B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RIGBX: FSGEX (2.58) vs RIGBX (1.11). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RIGBX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RIGBX (18 years). RIGBX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RIGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIGBX: FSGEX (0) vs RIGBX (250). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.59 vs. RIGBX (14.11). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.42 vs. RIGBX (29.22).
| FSGEX | RIGBX | FSGEX / RIGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.63 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.63 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.721 | 13.990 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77B | 21B | 367% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 1.11 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.59 | 14.11 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.08 | 56.06 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.42 | 29.22 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.26 | 88.62 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers