Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RIGCX
FSGEX vs RIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RIGCX
FSGEX vs RIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RIGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RIGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 77B vs. RIGCX (719M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RIGCX: FSGEX (2.58) vs RIGCX (1.34). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RIGCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RIGCX (26 years). RIGCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIGCX: FSGEX (0) vs RIGCX (2500). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.49 vs. RIGCX (9.94). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.03 vs. RIGCX (32.73).
| FSGEX | RIGCX | FSGEX / RIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.88 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.39 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.683 | 9.224 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77B | 719M | 10,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 1.34 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.49 | 9.94 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.52 | 51.82 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.03 | 32.73 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.13 | 115.13 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement