Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RLNAX
FSGEX vs RLNAX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RLNAX
FSGEX vs RLNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RLNAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RLNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. RLNAX (1.42B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RLNAX: FSGEX (2.64) vs RLNAX (0.60). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RLNAX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RLNAX (18 years). RLNAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and RLNAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.74 vs. RLNAX (13.68). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.38 vs. RLNAX (28.11).
| FSGEX | RLNAX | FSGEX / RLNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.26 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.28 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.175 | 7.655 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 1.42B | 5,240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 0.60 | 437% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.74 | 13.68 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.26 | 41.63 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.38 | 28.11 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.31 | 82.32 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement