Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RLNCX
FSGEX vs RLNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RLNCX
FSGEX vs RLNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RLNCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RLNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. RLNCX (1.4B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RLNCX: FSGEX (2.63) vs RLNCX (0.00). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RLNCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RLNCX (18 years). RLNCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and RLNCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.06 vs. RLNCX (10.22). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.66 vs. RLNCX (25.52).
| FSGEX | RLNCX | FSGEX / RLNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.01 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.03 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.153 | 8.192 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 1.4B | 5,335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.06 | 10.22 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.20 | 34.23 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.66 | 25.52 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.49 | 69.35 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers