Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RLNCX
FSGEX vs RLNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RLNCX
FSGEX vs RLNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RLNCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RLNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. RLNCX (1.42B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RLNCX: FSGEX (2.64) vs RLNCX (0.00). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RLNCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RLNCX (18 years). RLNCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and RLNCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.02 vs. RLNCX (12.47). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.31 vs. RLNCX (23.45).
| FSGEX | RLNCX | FSGEX / RLNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.01 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.03 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.339 | 7.464 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 1.42B | 5,232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.02 | 12.47 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.50 | 38.79 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.31 | 23.45 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.68 | 77.22 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers