Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RTNCX
FSGEX vs RTNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RTNCX
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$17.41
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.93B
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$13.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.9B
FSGEX vs RTNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RTNCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Buy and RTNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 55.9B vs. RTNCX (4.9B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: FSGEX (2.54) vs RTNCX (0.78). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RTNCX: FSGEX (16 years) vs RTNCX (10 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX (0) and RTNCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.66 vs. RTNCX (14.19). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.13 vs. RTNCX (38.14).
| FSGEX | RTNCX | FSGEX / RTNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.07 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.14 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.426 | 20.483 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.9B | 4.9B | 1,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 0.78 | 328% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.66 | 14.19 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.38 | 41.85 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.13 | 38.14 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.46 | 54.40 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement