Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RTNCX
FSGEX vs RTNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RTNCX
FSGEX vs RTNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RTNCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RTNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. RTNCX (5.98B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: FSGEX (2.64) vs RTNCX (1.01). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RTNCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RTNCX (11 years). RTNCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and RTNCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.02 vs. RTNCX (27.02). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.31 vs. RTNCX (30.83).
| FSGEX | RTNCX | FSGEX / RTNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.04 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.11 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.339 | 11.695 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 5.98B | 1,244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 1.01 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.02 | 27.02 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.50 | 54.39 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.31 | 30.83 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.68 | 98.32 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement