Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs RTNCX
FSGEX vs RTNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs RTNCX
FSGEX vs RTNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. RTNCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and RTNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. RTNCX (5.9B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: FSGEX (2.63) vs RTNCX (1.02). FSGEX was incepted earlier than RTNCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs RTNCX (11 years). RTNCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and RTNCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.06 vs. RTNCX (21.38). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.66 vs. RTNCX (30.73).
| FSGEX | RTNCX | FSGEX / RTNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.04 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.11 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.153 | 10.014 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 5.9B | 1,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.02 | 258% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.06 | 21.38 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.20 | 46.15 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.66 | 30.73 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.49 | 83.43 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement