Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs SICNX
FSGEX vs SICNX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs SICNX
FSGEX vs SICNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. SICNX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and SICNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 77B vs. SICNX (960M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than SICNX: FSGEX (2.58) vs SICNX (2.21). FSGEX was incepted earlier than SICNX: FSGEX (17 years) vs SICNX (18 years). SICNX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). SICNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and SICNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.42 vs. SICNX (16.24). SICNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.88 vs. FSGEX (55.13).
| FSGEX | SICNX | FSGEX / SICNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.86 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.87 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.246 | 12.097 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77B | 960M | 8,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 2.21 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.42 | 16.24 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.45 | 76.96 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.13 | 61.88 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.11 | 116.58 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement