Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs SICNX
FSGEX vs SICNX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs SICNX
FSGEX vs SICNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. SICNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and SICNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. SICNX (962M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than SICNX: FSGEX (2.63) vs SICNX (2.26). FSGEX was incepted earlier than SICNX: FSGEX (17 years) vs SICNX (18 years). SICNX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). SICNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX (0) and SICNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.06 vs. SICNX (22.44). SICNX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. FSGEX (53.66).
| FSGEX | SICNX | FSGEX / SICNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.86 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.87 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.153 | 10.388 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 962M | 7,786% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.26 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.06 | 22.44 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.20 | 68.44 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.66 | 62.32 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.49 | 114.69 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement