Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs TBWCX
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs TBWCX
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. TBWCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and TBWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 77B vs. TBWCX (461M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than TBWCX: FSGEX (2.58) vs TBWCX (0.32). FSGEX was incepted earlier than TBWCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs TBWCX (11 years). TBWCX (2.62) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). TBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.30 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBWCX: FSGEX (0) vs TBWCX (1000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.49 vs. TBWCX (9.38). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.03 vs. TBWCX (1.61).
| FSGEX | TBWCX | FSGEX / TBWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.95 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.62 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.683 | 4.800 | 327% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77B | 461M | 16,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 0.32 | 815% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.49 | 9.38 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.52 | 38.93 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.03 | 1.61 | 3,408% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.13 | 71.66 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers