Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs TBWCX
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs TBWCX
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. TBWCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Buy and TBWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. TBWCX (471M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than TBWCX: FSGEX (2.64) vs TBWCX (0.33). FSGEX was incepted earlier than TBWCX: FSGEX (17 years) vs TBWCX (11 years). TBWCX (2.62) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). TBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.30 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBWCX: FSGEX (0) vs TBWCX (5000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.37 vs. TBWCX (11.04). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.10 vs. TBWCX (9.34).
| FSGEX | TBWCX | FSGEX / TBWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.95 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.62 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.973 | 3.012 | 497% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3B | 471M | 15,775% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 0.33 | 808% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.37 | 11.04 | 293% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.19 | 34.88 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.10 | 9.34 | 569% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.45 | 77.89 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement