Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs TGRHX
FSGEX vs TGRHX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs TGRHX
FSGEX vs TGRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. TGRHX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and TGRHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.8B vs. TGRHX (409M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than TGRHX: FSGEX (2.66) vs TGRHX (0.26). FSGEX was incepted earlier than TGRHX: FSGEX (17 years) vs TGRHX (8 years). TGRHX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). TGRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGRHX: FSGEX (0) vs TGRHX (1000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.92 vs. TGRHX (-1.26). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 60.56 vs. TGRHX (-20.18).
| FSGEX | TGRHX | FSGEX / TGRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.20 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.41 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.847 | 4.545 | 349% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.8B | 409M | 18,289% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 0.26 | 1,029% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.92 | -1.26 | -2,063% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.41 | -6.48 | -1,179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.56 | -20.18 | -300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement