Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGGX vs VTMNX
FSGGX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSGGX vs VTMNX
FSGGX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGGX vs. VTMNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGGX is a Buy and VTMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 315B vs. FSGGX (19.7B). VTMNX pays higher dividends than FSGGX: VTMNX (2.56) vs FSGGX (2.38). FSGGX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: FSGGX (15 years) vs VTMNX (26 years). FSGGX (0.06) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). FSGGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 6.00 vs. VTMNX (4.00). FSGGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: FSGGX (0) vs VTMNX (5000000). FSGGX (26.63) and VTMNX (26.25) have marching annual gain over last year. FSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 61.08 vs. VTMNX (46.94).
| FSGGX | VTMNX | FSGGX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.03 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.03 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.399 | 17.997 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 315B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.56 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.63 | 26.25 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.76 | 67.54 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.08 | 46.94 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.66 | 107.10 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers