Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGRX vs WCMNX
FSGRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSGRX vs WCMNX
FSGRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGRX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. WCMNX (47.2M). FSGRX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSGRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSGRX (26 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSGRX (1.07). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSGRX (48.01). FSGRX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. WCMNX (2.55). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -8.65 vs. FSGRX (-14.63).
| FSGRX | WCMNX | FSGRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.24 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.04 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.921 | 3.690 | 242% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 47.2M | 4,998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | 2.55 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.30 | 22.49 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.63 | -8.65 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers