Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGRX vs WCMNX
FSGRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSGRX vs WCMNX
FSGRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGRX has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. WCMNX (52.4M). FSGRX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSGRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSGRX (26 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSGRX (1.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSGRX (16.31). FSGRX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.42 vs. FSGRX (16.96). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -1.40 vs. FSGRX (-12.85).
| FSGRX | WCMNX | FSGRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.24 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.04 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.835 | 9.225 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 52.4M | 4,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 25.42 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.90 | 31.21 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.85 | -1.40 | 918% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement