Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHBX vs LALDX
FSHBX vs LALDX Comparison
Open Charts FSHBX vs LALDX
FSHBX vs LALDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHBX vs. LALDX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHBX is a Hold and LALDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 43.3B vs. FSHBX (2.8B). LALDX pays higher dividends than FSHBX: LALDX (4.89) vs FSHBX (4.15). FSHBX was incepted earlier than LALDX: FSHBX (40 years) vs LALDX (33 years). LALDX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FSHBX (0.30). LALDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FSHBX (59.00). FSHBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LALDX: FSHBX (0) vs LALDX (1500). LALDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.35 vs. FSHBX (2.86). LALDX return over 5 years is better than : 12.94 vs. FSHBX (12.23).
| FSHBX | LALDX | FSHBX / LALDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.59 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.59 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.002 | 1.240 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.8B | 43.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.15 | 4.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | 3.35 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.37 | 16.52 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.23 | 12.94 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.07 | 29.40 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement