Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs FSPHX
FSHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. FSHCX (804M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FSHCX (0.70) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FSHCX (39 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FSHCX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSHCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.85 vs. FSHCX (-32.60). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -20.07 vs. FSHCX (-21.56).
| FSHCX | FSPHX | FSHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.320 | -8.330 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 804M | 5.74B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.02 | 3,951% |
| Returns for 1 year | -32.60 | -15.85 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | -36.27 | -10.48 | 346% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.56 | -20.07 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.64 | 5.50 | -84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers