Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs FSPHX
FSHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. FSHCX (899M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FSHCX (0.61) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FSHCX (39 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FSHCX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSHCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. FSHCX (-16.45). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -8.84 vs. FSHCX (-12.76).
| FSHCX | FSPHX | FSHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.246 | 10.532 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 899M | 6.22B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.02 | 3,852% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.45 | 0.02 | -97,298% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.72 | 10.47 | -217% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.76 | -8.84 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.78 | 39.34 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement