Ad is loading...
FSHCX vs FSPHX
FSHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. FSHCX (1.14B). FSHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FSHCX (0.54) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FSHCX (39 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FSHCX (0.68) and FSPHX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FSHCX (32.00). FSHCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.61 vs. FSHCX (-12.72). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.34 vs. FSPHX (10.17).
| FSHCX | FSPHX | FSHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.65 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.65 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.194 | -1.064 | -1,334% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 6.42B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.02 | 3,252% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.72 | -9.61 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.15 | -10.12 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.34 | 10.17 | 387% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.95 | 11.87 | 244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...