Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs FSPHX
FSHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. FSHCX (1.09B). FSHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FSHCX (0.58) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FSHCX (39 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FSHCX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSHCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.20 vs. FSHCX (-18.82). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : -2.67 vs. FSPHX (-14.75).
| FSHCX | FSPHX | FSHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.974 | -9.174 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 6.2B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.02 | 3,314% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.82 | -14.20 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.66 | -2.27 | 865% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.67 | -14.75 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.21 | 3.75 | 326% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement