Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs FSPHX
FSHCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FSHCX vs FSPHX
FSHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. FSHCX (852M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FSHCX (0.68) vs FSPHX (0.39). FSHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FSHCX (40 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FSHCX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSHCX (71.00) and FSPHX (69.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSHCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. FSPHX (6.59). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : -10.44 vs. FSPHX (-15.28).
| FSHCX | FSPHX | FSHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.62 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.62 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.188 | 1.735 | 645% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 852M | 6.75B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.39 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.50 | 6.59 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.01 | 5.15 | -136% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.44 | -15.28 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.18 | 46.40 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement