Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs SHSAX
FSHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6B vs. FSHCX (804M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FSHCX (0.70) vs SHSAX (0.24). FSHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FSHCX (39 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FSHCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -19.20 vs. FSHCX (-32.60). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -19.83 vs. FSHCX (-21.56).
| FSHCX | SHSAX | FSHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.320 | -9.721 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 804M | 6B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.24 | 299% |
| Returns for 1 year | -32.60 | -19.20 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | -36.27 | -10.66 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.56 | -19.83 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.64 | 0.12 | -3,807% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement