Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs SHSAX
FSHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a StrongBuy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.52B vs. FSHCX (977M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FSHCX (0.62) vs SHSAX (0.23). FSHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FSHCX (39 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FSHCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.00 vs. FSHCX (-17.76). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.33 vs. SHSAX (-2.95).
| FSHCX | SHSAX | FSHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.135 | -0.737 | -154% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 977M | 6.52B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.23 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.76 | -13.00 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.95 | 0.40 | -3,226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.33 | -2.95 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.91 | 12.25 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers