Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs SHSAX
FSHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 5.87B vs. FSHCX (971M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FSHCX (0.61) vs SHSAX (0.22). FSHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FSHCX (39 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FSHCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -22.14 vs. FSHCX (-28.57). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : -14.10 vs. SHSAX (-18.73).
| FSHCX | SHSAX | FSHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.006 | -8.520 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 5.87B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.22 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.57 | -22.14 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.57 | -6.91 | 413% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.10 | -18.73 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.31 | -2.17 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement