Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs SHSAX
FSHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.44B vs. FSHCX (1.09B). FSHCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FSHCX (0.58) vs SHSAX (0.22). FSHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FSHCX (39 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FSHCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.25 vs. FSHCX (-18.82). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : -2.67 vs. SHSAX (-8.37).
| FSHCX | SHSAX | FSHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.974 | -4.020 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 6.44B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.22 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.82 | -15.25 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.66 | -10.14 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.67 | -8.37 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.21 | 8.34 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement