Ad is loading...
FSHCX vs SHSAX
FSHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.69B vs. FSHCX (1.14B). FSHCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FSHCX (0.54) vs SHSAX (0.21). FSHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FSHCX (39 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.68). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FSHCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.24 vs. FSHCX (-15.28). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.05 vs. SHSAX (-5.29).
| FSHCX | SHSAX | FSHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.09 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.09 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.419 | -2.242 | -286% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 6.69B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.21 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.28 | -10.24 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.82 | -11.79 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.05 | -5.29 | -133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.10 | 14.51 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...